In “'Sounding Out': A Pervasive
Cultural Model of Reading”, Catherine Compton-Lilly details her own
research indicating that, despite students', parents', and even
teachers' reliance on the mantra sound it out
as a strategy for approaching unfamiliar words, successful readers
actually use a range of strategies including, but not limited to,
relying on the structure of language to guess the unknown word and
using cues like pictures. In fact, it turns out the sound-it-out
strategy is pretty low on the list.
Last semester, during my first field
experience, and in the absence of practical knowledge about teaching
literacy in K-2, I certainly found myself falling back on the
familiar mantra. In one particular case, a second grader (who had
been held back a year) asked me how to spell the word 'ready' (a
spelling strategy in its own right) during a writing activity.
Although reading and writing are not the same thing, the two
processes do have a reciprocal relationship, and so I instinctively
told her to sound it out and to try to think about which letters
would correspond to those sounds. And I did this in spite of the
fact that she had an Fudd-like speech impediment. To her
credit, she knew that the word ready involved the vowel digraph “ea”
and that the word ended in “y”, but because of my over-reliance
on the sound-it-out strategy, she naturally ended up spelling the
word 'weady.' Looking
at it now, I see all the strengths she brought to the table and that
my only contribution resulted in her only spelling error.
Although this student who was held back
had a generally positive disposition toward reading, there was
another student in this K-2 class who was feeling very frustrated
with his own efforts to read. He enjoyed books and loved to be read
to, but when individual reading time rolled around he focused
exclusively on pictures and often refused to attempt to work with
text. It occurs to me now that this first grader also had a (much
more serious) speech impediment, and I wonder whether his frustration
was the result of a clash between his own ability to reproduce
phonologically Standard English and the general cultural insistence
on the sound-it-out strategy.
Compton-Lilly suggests that the
sound-it-out strategy is of limited use to all students and that it
is of particularly limited use to students who speak a dialect other
than Standard English. I wonder then, do speech impediments present
another distinct dimension of complication to phonetic reading
strategies? What particular considerations should we keep in mind
for these students?
2.15.14 UPDATE: It turns out that they reciprocal relationship between reading and writing is not quite as strict on the sound-it-out strategy. While it is true that this strategy remains of limited use for reading, for a particular stage of writing development, this strategy is actually very useful. Of course, I didn't know that at the time!
2.15.14 UPDATE: It turns out that they reciprocal relationship between reading and writing is not quite as strict on the sound-it-out strategy. While it is true that this strategy remains of limited use for reading, for a particular stage of writing development, this strategy is actually very useful. Of course, I didn't know that at the time!
Vincent, This strategy of sounding out is getting some much needed buzz. You made a great point about students with different dialects. It is important that our strategies are inclusive of all learners!
ReplyDelete